Yes. Below is the table of the format or syntax to be used when encoding in the system, to wit:
Audit Issuance/Form | Format |
1. ND/NS/NC Note: xxx is the number in the actual ND/NS/NC | ND/NS/NC No. xxx[-Agency-Region-Area-Sub-Area (if applicable)] Example:
San Fernando Water District xxx[-San Fernando WD-RO3-Pampanga]
xxx[-UPLB-Laguna] xxx[-Cagayan SU-Carig]
xxx[-DPWH-RO1-Ilocos Sur-1st DEO] |
2. NFD Note: yyyy-nnn is the number in the actual NFD; if none, a number should be provided for monitoring purposes Legend: CCD - Corporate Cluster Director (CD) NCD - National CD RO - Regional Office [n] - Cluster or RO Number | Audit Team (AT) Level NFD-AT-Agency-Region-yyyy-nnn Example: NFD-AT-DPWH-RO3-2019-001 Director Level NFD-CCD[n]-yyyy-nnn NCD[n]-yyyy-nnn RO[n]-yyyy-nnn BARMM-yyyy-nnn CAR-yyyy-nnn Example: NFD-NCD1-2019-001 |
3. COE Note: Same syntax/format with NFD | COE-CCD[n]-yyyy-nnn NCD[n]-yyyy-nnn RO[n]-yyyy-nnn BARMM-yyyy-nnn CAR-yyyy-nnn Example: COE-NCD1-2019-001 |
4. NSSDC Note: Same syntax/format with ND/NS/NC | NSSDC No. xxx[-Agency-Region-Area-Sub-Area (if applicable)] Example:
San Fernando Water District xxx[-San Fernando WD-RO3-Pampanga]
xxx[-UPLB-Laguna] xxx[-Cagayan SU-Carig]
xxx[-DPWH-RO1-Ilocos Sur-1st DEO] |
However, the numbering system format above is specifically for the data build-up in the COEMIS, without prejudice to the numbering system or the numbers already assigned to the ND/NC/NS/NFD/COE/NSSDC that have already been issued pursuant to the 2009 RRSA.
Can't find the answer you're looking for?
No problem open a new ticket to contact our support.
Please wait... it will take a second!
